Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Blog Topic #1

My first choice for CP is the Peninsula Humane Society (PHS) in Burlingame. They are a nonprofit no-kill shelter that my family adopted our second dog from fifteen years ago.

PHS has many programs beyond housing at-large or surrendered animals waiting for adoption. They have a spay-neuter clinic, animal rescue and control and a wildlife care center. They provide obedience classes, pet loss grief support, and microchipping along with many other services.

In terms of providing for local needs, spay-neuter clinic is the effective way to reduce pet overpopulation in San Mateo county. Animal control and rescue takes in animals reported at-large. Wildlife nurses wild animals back to health. Obedience classes teach new owners and new pets how to coexist in their home. Grief support for pet loss provides a place of solace for grieving owners. Microchipping provides owners peace of mind that if PHS picks up their animal, their pet will be checked for a microchip and they'll get a call to pick them up.

I think local government do not fulfill this need because animals are not humans or citizens and cannot pay taxes or vote.

My CP is not directly affiliated with the national ASPCA and so receives no funding or direction from them. I am unsure whom my CP is accountable to besides the county in which it resides.

The surrender fee taken by the PHS from owners who give up their animals is set and forwarded by San Mateo County. That is not a federal constraint but a local government constraint. I am unaware of any federal constraints placed on PHS.

No comments:

Post a Comment